Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 927 SO2D 266 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Michigan v. Lucas · Teemer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. Opinion and reputation evidence. When an accused is charged with a crime involving sexually assaultive behavior, reputation or opinion of the past sexual behavior of the victim is not admissible. |19B. Other evidence; exceptions. When an accused is charged with a crime involving sexually assaultive behavior, evidence of specific instances of the victim’s past sexual behavior is also not admissible except for: (1) Evidence of past sexual behavior with persons other than the accused, upon the issue of whether or not the accused was the source of semen or injury; provided that such evidence is limited to a period not to exceed seventy-two hours prior to the time of the offense, and further provided that the jury be instructed at the time and in its final charge regarding the limited purpose for which the evidence is admitted; or * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “protect victims of rape from being exposed at trial to harassing or irrelevant questions concerning their past sexual behavior.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.