Byrom v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Gregg v. Georgia · Furman v. Georgia · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] motion for a change of venue is not automatically granted in a capital case. There must be a satisfactory showing that a defendant cannot receive a fair and impartial trial in the county where the offense is charged.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. King v. State · Cox v. State“must be directly assessed for reasonableness in all the circumstances.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“cases in which we find harmless error or any error which is not specifically found to be reversible in and of itself, we shall have the discretion to determine, on a case-by-case basis, as to whether such error or errors, although not reversible when standing alone, may when considered cumulatively require reversal because of the resulting cumulative prejudicial effect.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.