Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

927 So. 2d 972

Schuman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-03-29

Decided 2006-03-29

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed. We note that Appellant’s issue concerning double jeopardy is mooted by the subsequent amendment of the judgment. Merging counts VII and VIII into counts I and II effectively vacated counts VII and VIII.

STONE, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.
/927/so2d/972 · .json · Public domain