Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 927 SW2D 644 - Hernandez v. State

Hernandez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 1996
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. State · State v. Mancuso · Coit v. State · Smith v. State · State v. Mancuso

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... [W]e hold that under the law in effect at the time of the commission of the instant offenses, the only way a defendant’s punishment could be enhanced under the provisions of § 12.42 was if the defendant committed a state jail felony under the circumstances described in § 12.35(c) which mandates the defendant shall be punished for a third degree felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.