Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 928 F.2d 1481 - Creech v. Arave

Creech v. Arave’s Empirical Analysis

928 F.2d 1481 · 1991

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
March 2004
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Faretta v. California · North Carolina v. Alford · Hill v. Lockhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence against Creech. 38 In Evans v. Meyer, 742 F.2d 371 (7th Cir.1984), the court opined that where uncontested facts make it inconceivable that a jury would acquit on the proposed defense, a plea entered without the defendant's knowledge of the defense can nevertheless be voluntary. See also Hill, 474 U.S. at 59 , 106 S.Ct. at 370 (”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Creech v. Arave · Creech v. Arave
  2. “standards. The Court has approved limiting constructions that have defined the terms of the statutory aggravating circumstance through objective standards. In Walton v. Arizona, --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 3047, 3057 , 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990) the Court upheld an aggravating factor of”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
    e.g. Creech v. Arave · Creech v. Arave
  3. “and therefore cannot be allowed to stand. We find these arguments differ merely in form, not in substance, Evans v. Meyer, 742 F.2d 371 , 375 (7th Cir.1984), and therefore we will discuss them together. 17 A guilty plea must represent”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Creech v. Arave · Creech v. Arave

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.