Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 928 F.2d 255 - Thomas v. Sullivan

Thomas v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

928 F.2d 255 · 1991

Citation profile

109
cited by 109 later decisions
August 2014
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 16 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 109 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Woolf v. Shalala (1993), Robinson v. Sullivan (1992)

19 federal appellate · 16 district ·

730199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Benskin v. Bowen · Schisler v. Heckler · Booz v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As is true in many disability cases, there is no doubt that the claimant is experiencing pain; the real issue is how severe that pain is.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he treating physician rule is premised, at least in part, on the notion that 'the treating physician is usually more familiar with a claimant's medical condition than are other physicians.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[A] treating physician's opinion is normally accorded a higher degree of deference than that of a consulting physician....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.