Rodriguez v. Hoke’s Empirical Analysis
928 F.2d 534 · 1991
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably State v. Thiel (2003), George Lindstadt v. John P. Keane, Superintendent (2001)
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Rose v. Lundy · Allen v. United States · Grady v. LeFevre
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ince Rodriguez's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel can turn on the cumulative effect of all of counsel's actions, all his allegations of ineffective assistance should be reviewed together.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Thiel · Fisher v. Angelone“[t]he state courts should have been given the opportunity to consider all the circumstances and the cumulative effect of all the claims as a whole”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.