Fussell F-V Fussell F-V v. Price’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2025
3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Younger v. Harris · Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Kelly v. Robinson · Perez v. Ledesma · Kugler v. Helfant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The criminal justice system is not operated primarily for the benefit of victims, but for the benefit of society as a whole. Thus, it is concerned not only with punishing the offender, but also with rehabilitating him. Although restitution does resemble a judgment “for the benefit of’ the victim, the context in which it is imposed undermines that conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter of Rosa““If any clear principle emerges from our decision, it is that a prosecutor’s restitutionary motives are not in themselves evil. More is required.to secure the intervention of a federal court in state criminal proceedings.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“anauthorization [sic], as required under 28 U.S.C. 2283, for a court of the United States to stay the action of a State court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.