Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 928 F.2d 816 - Consolidated Grain & Barge Co. v. Madgett

Consolidated Grain & Barge Co. v. Madgett’s Empirical Analysis

928 F.2d 816 · 1991

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jenks v. Jenks · Ohio Calculating, Inc. v. CPT Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This letter creates merely an agreement to negotiate in good faith. Under Minnesota law, such an agreement is unenforceable where the agreement evidences nothing more than an intention to negotiate in the future.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an agreement to negotiate is unenforceable”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.