California Communities Against Toxics v. Envtl. Prot. Agency’s Empirical Analysis
928 F.3d 1041 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 6901 (Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992) · 42 U.S.C. § 6902 · 42 U.S.C. § 6903 · 42 U.S.C. § 6921 · 42 U.S.C. § 6976 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Allen v. McCurry · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Agency action is also arbitrary and capricious if it 'offered insufficient reasons for treating similar situations differently.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.