Samayoa v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
928 F.3d 1127 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3599 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Atkins v. Virginia · Ford v. Wainwright · Harbison v. Bell · Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp. · Washington v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“state provisions for clemency counsel do not bar the appointment of additional counsel under § 3599 for purposes of state clemency proceedings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bowles v. Desantis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.