Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 928 F.3d 1155 - Colbruno v. Kessler

Colbruno v. Kessler’s Empirical Analysis

928 F.3d 1155 · 2019

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Farmer v. Brennan · Bell v. Wolfish · County of Sacramento v. Lewis · United States v. Salerno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f a restriction or condition is not reasonably related to a legitimate goal-if it is arbitrary or purposeless-a court permissibly may infer that the purpose of the governmental action is punishment that may not constitutionally be inflicted upon detainees qua detainees.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “not rationally related to a legitimate governmental objective or ... excessive in relation to that purpose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.