Cabas v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis
928 F.3d 177 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229A (§ 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Guo v. Ashcroft · 24 I. & N. Dec. 247 - S-Y-G · Marquez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Gui Cun Liu v. Ashcroft · Raza v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“committed an error of law or exercised its judgment in an arbitrary, capricious, or irrational way”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the evidence submitted with the petitioner's motion to reopen with the evidence presented at his merits hearing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lucaj v. Wilkinson“requires nothing more than proof that a document or thing is what it purports to be,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.