Geffner v. Coca-Cola Co.’s Empirical Analysis
928 F.3d 198 · 2019
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 343 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Cohen v. Koenig · Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. Wildenstein · Fink v. Time Warner Cable · Premium Mortgage Corp. v. Equifax, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in determining whether a reasonable consumer would have been misled by a particular advertisement, context is crucial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.