Raulerson v. Warden’s Empirical Analysis
928 F.3d 987 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Morrissey v. Brewer · Grogan v. Garner · Lockett v. Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is no consensus about the Flynn effect among experts or among the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. In re Bowles“adjusts for the empirical observation that IQ scores are rising over time,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. In re Bowles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.