928 F. Supp. 2d 10 - Arias v. Dyncorp’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi AB · Peteet v. Dow Chemical Co. · Ambrosini v. Labarraque
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“how that experience leads to the conclusions reached, why that experience is a sufficient basis for the opinion and how that experience is reliably applied to the facts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“An expert may ... rely on a temporal relationship between the exposure to a toxin and onset of symptoms to form a specific causation opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he proponents of [expert] evidence ... bear the burden to prove that the expert testimony is reliable by a preponderance of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.