Diallo v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Drane v. State · Jacobs v. State · Wendling v. State · Williams v. State · MQM v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“resort to the reasonable inferences based upon an examination of the surrounding circumstances to determine”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“intent to deceive and thereby work a reliance and injury. " Wendling v. State, 465 N.E.2d 169, 170 (Ind.1984) (emphasis added). Actual injury is not required; potential injury is enough. See Diallo v. State, 928 N.E.2d 250, 252 (Ind. Ct.App.2010) ("[T]here must be a potential benefit to the maker or potential injury to the defrauded party”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bocanegra v. State“An intent to defraud involves an intent to deceive and thereby work a reliance and an injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bocanegra v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.