Malenchik v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anglemyer v. State · Cardwell v. State · Thacker v. State · Reffett v. State · Dumas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“supplement and enhance a judge's evaluation, weighing, and application of the other sentencing evidence in the formulation of an individualized sentencing program appropriate for each defendant.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“may be made accessible if the information is declared by a court with jurisdiction over the case to be essential to the resolution of litigation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. J.S. v. State · JS v. State“do not limit the matters that the court may consider in determining the sentence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. J.S. v. State · JS v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.