Erwin v. Roe’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 4851 (Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992) · 42 U.S.C. § 4851A · 42 U.S.C. § 4851B · 42 U.S.C. § 4852 · 42 U.S.C. § 4852D
Relies on Grable & Sons Metal Products Inc. Darue Engineering & Mfg. · Brooks v. Lewin Realty III, Inc. · Brown v. Dermer · Crunkilton v. Hook · Filip v. Block
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Should it appear from the affidavits of a party opposing the motion that he cannot for reasons stated present by affidavit facts essential to justify his opposition, the court may refuse the application for judgment or may order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or depositions to be taken or discovery to be had or may make such other order as is just.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]e hold that ... violation of the [Residential Lead-based Paint Reduction Act] is given negligence per se effect in Indiana tort proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.