Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 928 P2D 1234 - Scott v. State

Scott v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2014

8 state decisions

40199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Norris · Cooksey v. State · Roman v. State · United States v. Freed · Miller v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is entitled to treat each element of the offense as having been proved, despite the defendant's protestations of innocence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “in effect a consent that the court may proceed to accept the allegations in the indictment as true”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is an admission of every essential element of the offense well pleaded in the charge”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.