Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 928 P2D 1286 - Dikeou v. Dikeou

Dikeou v. Dikeou’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2020

11 state decisions

601996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota), N. A. · Jones v. Jackson · Lowenschuss v. Resorts International, Inc. · Greenwood Trust Company v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Weston v. Rodriguez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is similar. COLO. REV. STAT. § 5-12-102. Notwithstanding these presumptions, the Colorado legislature allowed Colorado parties to contract to higher interest rates but established usury limits: (1) The parties to any ... promissory note , or other instrument of writing may stipulate therein for the payment of a greater or higher rate of interest than eight percent per annum, but not exceeding forty-five percent per annum , and any such stipulation may be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction in the state .... COLO. REV. STAT. § 5-12-103 (emphasis added) (the”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he rate of interest shall be deemed to be excessive of the limit under this section only if it could have been determined at the time of the stipulation by mathematical computation that such rate would exceed an annual rate of forty-five percent when the rate of interest was calculated on the unpaid balances of the debt on the assumption that the debt is to be paid according to its terms and will not be paid before the end of the agreed term.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that for nonconsumer loans a default interest rate is ... enforceable so long as the applied per annum rate, when added to the initial rate charged on the outstanding principle, is less than 45% of the unpaid principal balance at the time of the default.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.