State v. Wells’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Katz v. United States · Chimel v. California · United States v. Satterfield · State v. Ramirez · State v. Sery
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) “[w]hether or not the arrestee was placed in some sort of restraints”; (2) “[t]he position of the officer vis-a-vis the defendant in relation to the place searched”; (3) “[t]he ease or difficulty of gaining access” to the searched area or item; and (4) “[t]he number of officers present in relation to the number of arres-tees or other persons.” .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[the State must demonstrate 'that the cireumstances of the [search or] seizure constitute an exception to the warrant requirement.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“search and seizure issues are fact sensitive”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Loya
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.