Sears v. Romer’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
1 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2020
1 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Czemerynski · Bertrand v. Board of County Commissioners of Park County · O'QUINN v. Walt Disney Productions, Inc. · Duran v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office · Colorado Ass'n of Public Employees v. Lamm
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Conversely, a regulation which is expressly or impliedly authorized by the enabling statute will be given force and effect.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“unless expressly or impliedly authorized by statute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“§ 12-55.5-104(1)(a), coupled with the Act's stated purpose of protecting the health, safety, and welfare of hunters and fishermen by registering and regulating persons who provide equipment and personal services for the purpose of hunting or fishing, authorizes the Director to promulgate rules governing revoked outfitters when they are engaged solely in booking agent activities. Contrary to the Director's argument, in our view, the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McCool v. Sears
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.