People v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Kogan v. People · People v. Marques · Maisel v. People · People v. Dement
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and may include testimony regarding affixed labels and tags, signs, shelf tags, and notices tending to indicate the price of the thing involved. The final sentence of the second section specifies that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Jaeb · People v. Pearman“See-tion 18-4-414 simply obviates the need to subpoena store managers and go through the same colloquy in every case of retail theft.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Pearman“evidence of the value of the thing involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Pearman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.