Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 928 SO2D 1178 - Jones v. State

Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Ring v. Arizona · Caldwell v. Mississippi · 490 So. 2d 927 - Maxwell v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[C]ounsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to present evidence that would open the door to damaging cross-examination and rebuttal evidence that would counter any value that might be gained from the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.' A reasonable probability is a `probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “To establish deficient performance, a petitioner must demonstrate that counsel's representation `fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.