Pittman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · 604 So. 2d 280 - Fleming v. State · 380 So. 2d 1276 - Gathright v. State · 428 So. 2d 1361 - Pearson v. State · 708 So. 2d 18 - Underwood v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is well settled that when the trial judge sustains an objection to testimony and he directs the jury to disregard it, prejudicial error does not result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Woods v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.