Tanchel v. Shoemaker’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 509 So. 2d 1097 - Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage · 655 So. 2d 91 - Allstate Ins. Co. v. Langston · 653 So. 2d 1030 - Amente v. Newman · Wooten, Honeywell & Kest, PA v. Posner · 639 So. 2d 1129 - Caterpillar Indus., Inc. v. Keskes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“discovery should be denied when it has been established that the information requested is neither relevant to any pending claim or defense nor will it lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`litigants are not entitled to carte blanche discovery of irrelevant material.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.