928 So. 2d 633 - State v. Bonit’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Sullivan v. Louisiana · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · McKaskle v. Wiggins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Art. 803. Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant immaterial The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness: [[Image here]] (6) Records of regularly conducted business activity. A memorandum, report, record, or other data compilation, in any form, including but not limited to that which is stored by the use of an optical disk imaging system, of acts, events, * * * if made and kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, and if it was the regular practice of that business activity to make and keep the memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness, unless the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shall be served consecutively to the sentence imposed under the provisions of R.S. 14:64.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.