Thoms v. Thoms’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 824 So. 2d 623 - Sanderson v. Sanderson · 802 So. 2d 77 - Baker v. State · 919 So. 2d 876 - Ferrara v. Walters · 881 So. 2d 184 - Griffith v. Pell · 644 So. 2d 1218 - Ivy v. Harrington
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is premature and not ripe for appellate review, and we decline to address it today.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.