Howze v. Garner’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 794 So. 2d 999 - Hudson v. Courtesy Motors, Inc. · 358 So. 2d 1008 - Hoffman v. Planters Gin Co., Inc. · 719 So. 2d 757 - LITTLE BY LITTLE v. Bell · Corley v. Evans · Roy Dry, a Minor v. Ford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to fall within the Hoffman exception, the landowner must be aware of the licensee’s presence upon the premises, the landowner must engage in affirmative or active negligence in the operation or control of a.business, the landowner[’s] conduct in regards thereto must subject the licensee or invitee tp unusual danger, or increase the hazard to him, and the landowner’s active or affirmative.negligence must have proximately caused the plaintiffs injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.