Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 928 SO2D 922 - Walls v. State

Walls v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Idaho v. Wright · 437 So. 2d 19 - Box v. State · 863 So. 2d 836 - Byrom v. State · 749 So. 2d 123 - Sheffield v. State · 604 So. 2d 271 - Wells v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the judge should make an overall determination of the likelihood that these statements are true and make an on the record finding that there is substantial indicia of reliability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Even if this Court finds an erroneous admission or exclusion of evidence, we will not reverse unless the error adversely affects a substantial right of a party.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The information must assist the trier of fact and the opinion must be based upon first hand knowledge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.