Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

928 S.W.2d 14

Martin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1996

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1996-09-03

Decided 1996-09-03

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2In his Rule 24.035 motion, Movant alleges his trial counsel failed to investigate and discuss potential witnesses and the potential outcome of his case if it went to trial. The motion court denied his motion without a hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their in*15formation only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/928/sw2d/14 · .json · Public domain