Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

928 S.W.2d 16

State v. Lomax

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 1996

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1996-09-03

Decided 1996-09-03

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendant appeals the trial court’s judgment entered on his conviction of delivery of a controlled substance. § 195.211 RSMo 1994. Defendant also appeals the motion court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief. Both appeals have been consolidated for review pursuant to Rule 29.15(e).

¶3No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The judgments of the trial court and motion court are affirmed pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).

/928/sw2d/16 · .json · Public domain