State v. Garrison’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Faretta v. California · Joseph v. United States · Lumpkin v. Lumpkin · Biondi v. United States · State v. Hornbuckle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An application for a continuance shall be made by a written motion accompa nied by the affidavit of the applicant or some other credible person setting forth the facts upon which the application is based, unless the adverse party consents that the application for continuance may be made orally.[ 2 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Woodson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.