State v. Price’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2015
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kliewer v. New Jersey · Day v. State · State v. Dulany · State v. Blankenship · Jones v. South Carolina
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Sudden passion arising from adequate cause is a special negative defense to conventional second-degree murder. It is an element of the crime and when properly introduced, it requires a finding by the jury that the defendant did not commit the murder under the influence of sudden passion to find the defendant guilty of second degree murder. Once a defendant has properly injected the issue of sudden passion, the state bears the burden of disproving it beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant is entitled to have the jury consider voluntary manslaughter instead of second-degree murder when the defense introduces adequate evidence of the special negative defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Denson v. State“directly caused by and arising out of provocation by the victim... which passion arises at the time of the offense and is not solely the result of former provocation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[k]nowingly causes the death of another person or, with the purpose of causing serious physical injury to another person, causes the death of another person”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.