Appley v. West’s Empirical Analysis
929 F.2d 1176 · 1991
Citation profile
40 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp. (1994), Lynn E. Anweiler v. American Electric Power Service Corporation and Aetna Life Insurance Company (1993)
40 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)
Relies on Brendale v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation · Belisle v. Anzivino · Becker v. Tenenbaum-Hill Associates, Inc. · Gerill Corp. v. Jack L. Hargrove Builders, Inc. · Appley v. West
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]ll material facts set forth in the statement required of the moving party [under Rule 12 M] will be deemed to be admitted unless controverted by the statement of the opposing party.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(3) a statement of material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving party to a judgment as a matter of law. •I» ‘I- The statement referred to in (3) shall consist of short numbered paragraphs, including within each paragraph specific references to the affidavits, parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon to support the facts set forth in that paragraph. Failure to submit such a statement constitutes grounds for denial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and if the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.