Baker v. Kaiser’s Empirical Analysis
929 F.2d 1495 · 1991
Citation profile
39 federal appellate · 7 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Lozada v. State (1994), English v. Cody (1998)
39 federal appellate · 7 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright · Douglas v. People of State of California · Brewer v. Williams · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must explain the advantages and disadvantages of an appeal ... [and] inquire whether the defendant wants to appeal the conviction; if that is the client's wish, counsel must perfect an appeal.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“never advised [the defendant] of the pros and cons of appealing his conviction, and did not ascertain whether he wanted to appeal.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“insufficient to satisfy the right to counsel.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.