Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 929 F.2d 442 - United States v. Becker

United States v. Becker’s Empirical Analysis

929 F.2d 442 · 1991

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
6
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably United States v. Smith (2001), 208 Ill. 2d 118 - People v. Johnson (2003)

51 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions

3701991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3109 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731

Relies on New Jersey v. T. L. O. · United States v. Wilson · Di Bella v. United States · Dalia v. United States · Democratic Party of the United States v. Wisconsin ex rel. La Follette

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]ermitting the late filing of such a certificate falls within the discretion of the court”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'reasonably necessary to effectively execute a search warrant.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “. “Claims that otherwise reasonable searches have been conducted in an unconstitutionally unreasonable manner must be judged under the facts and circumstances of each case.” Whether a search is unreasonable because of its intolerable intensity must be determined by the particular facts of each case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.