Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 929 F.2d 534 - Ellison v. Sullivan

Ellison v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

929 F.2d 534 · 1990

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 29 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit Corp. (1994), Emory v. Sullivan (1991)

19 federal appellate · 29 district · 2 state decisions

410199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Williams v. Bowen · Broadbent v. Harris · Byron v. Heckler · Brown v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Subjective complaints of pain must be evaluated in light of plaintiff's credibility and the medical evidence.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[e]vidence is not substantial if it is overwhelmed by other evidence”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The ALJ reasonably concluded based on the medical evidence presented that plaintiff was capable of working despite [her] assertions to the contrary. We cannot say this finding was not supported by substantial evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.