Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 929 F.2d 541 - Facio v. Jones

Facio v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis

929 F.2d 541 · 1991

Citation profile

147
cited by 147 later decisions
December 2020
most recently cited

72 federal appellate · 24 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 147 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Noel v. Hall (2003), Phelps v. Hamilton (1997)

72 federal appellate · 24 district ·

7501991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1257 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · O'Shea v. Littleton · Golden v. Zwickler · Texas v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 147 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “plaintiff cannot maintain a declaratory or injunctive action unless he or she can demonstrate a good chance of being likewise injured in the future.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any declaratory relief that is 'inextricably intertwined' with the state court judgment,”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[w]here a constitutional issue could have been reviewed on direct appeal by the state appellate courts, a litigant may not seek to reverse or modify the state court judgment by bringing a constitutional claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.