Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 929 F.2d 618 - Luckey III v. Miller

Luckey III v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

929 F.2d 618 · 1991

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
March 2016
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably 31 Foster Children v. Bush (2003), United States v. Tamayo (1996)

26 federal appellate · 1 district ·

330199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Milliken v. Bradley · United Families of America v. Kendrick · In re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a summary denial of rehearing en banc is insufficient to confer any implication or inference regarding the court's opinion relative to the merits of a case”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “As we have repeatedly recognized, findings of fact and conclusions of law by an appellate court are generally binding in all subsequent proceedings in the same case in the trial or on a later appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “clearly does not extend to issues an appellate court did not address,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.