Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

929 F.2d 694

Docket No. 91-7262.

Charles Edward Smith v. Edward W. Murray, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted March 4, 1991. Decided March 22, 1991.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-03-22

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Lumis Keith Bynum

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-03-22

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-90-305)

Charles Edward Smith, appellant pro se.

Hazel Elizabeth Shaffer, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Charles Edward Smith seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Murray, CA-90-305 (E.D.Va. Dec. 17, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/929/f2d/694 · .json · Public domain