Riddell v. Ewell’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
February 2009
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Barnard v. Gaumer · Bors v. McGowan · Hornsilver Circle, Ltd. v. Trope · Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp. · 5 Wash. 2d 81 - Hughes v. Boyer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[In Riddell /,] a division of this court determined only that, because the Riddells’ easement was created pursuant to an express grant, the Riddells were entitled to ■widen the driveway to the extent allowed by the grant, without having to show that the widening was reasonably necessary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“do whatever is reasonably necessary to permit [the easement's] full use and enjoyment”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Story v. Bly
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.