Tanasse v. Snow’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 62 Cal. App. 3d 389 - Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc. · U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co. · Wright v. Shriners Hospital for Crippled Children · 121 Ill. 2d 537 - People v. Hillenbrand · Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & Spivak
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Are legal malpractice claims assignable? (2) Even if they are not, may they be reached by execution? (3) Even assuming that a legal malpractice cause of action can generally be levied upon by a judgment creditor through an execution sale, does public policy preclude the very law firm against whom the claim is asserted from purchasing the claim?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“execute the writ [of execution] against the non-exempt property of the judgment debtor by levying on a sufficient amount of property, if there is sufficient property; collecting or selling the choses in action and selling the other property in the manner set forth herein.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in the Utah version of Rule 69 without restriction of any sort.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.