Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

929 So. 2d 1191

Floyd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-06-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2014

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-06-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm Myshion Floyd’s appeal on the charge of battery on a law enforcement officer. We remand, however, to the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error. The judgment form entered by the trial court shows an “X” marking the option that Floyd “Entered a plea of nolo contendere to the following crimes,” and then lists the offense of battery on a law enforcement officer. However, the record shows that Floyd actually entered a written plea of not guilty, and was subsequently found guilty by jury trial. Appellant need not be present to correct this error.

¶2 Affirmed; Remanded.

STEVENSON, C.J., SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.
/929/so2d/1191 · .json · Public domain