Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 929 SO2D 13 - Hicks v. State

Hicks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States · Ornelas v. United States · Smith v. Maryland · United States v. Salvucci

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A search violates a defendant's Fourth Amendment rights only if (1) a defendant demonstrates that he or she had an actual, subjective expectation of privacy in the property searched and (2) a defendant establishes that society would recognize that subjective expectation as objectively reasonable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The Fourth Amendment does not protect a defendant from a warrantless search of property that he stole, because regardless of whether he expects to maintain privacy in the contents of the stolen property, such an expectation is not one that `society is prepared to accept as reasonable.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.