Palm v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 511 So. 2d 1114 - Freshwater v. Vetter · Ohio Cas. Ins. Co. v. MRK Const., Inc. · 566 So. 2d 838 - Chanrai Investments, Inc. v. Clement · 115 So. 2d 84 - Bevis Construction Co. v. Grace · Antonelli v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Amending a complaint during trial to assert a new cause of action generally should not be permitted over objection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.