Hibbert v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 876 So. 2d 24 - Garrett v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Direct criminal contempt may be punished summarily if the court saw or heard the conduct constituting the contempt committed in the actual presence of the court. 2. The judgment of guilt for contempt shall include a recital of those facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based. 3. Prior to the adjudication of guilt, the judge shall inform the defendant of the accusation against him or her and inquire as to whether the defendant has any cause to show why he or she should not be adjudged guilty of contempt by the court and sentenced therefor. 4. The defendant shall be given the opportunity to present evidence of excusing or mitigating circumstances [before sentencing], 5. The judgment shall be signed by the judge and entered of record. 6. The sentence shall be pronounced in open court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Searcy v. State · Woodson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.