Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 929 So. 2d 654 - State v. Colitto

929 So. 2d 654 - State v. Colitto’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Ornelas v. United States · United States v. Sokolow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ppellate courts should continue to accord a presumption of correctness to the trial court's rulings on motions to suppress with regard to the trial court's determination of historical facts, but appellate courts must independently review mixed questions of law and fact that ultimately determine constitutional issues arising in the context of the Fourth and Fifth Amendment and by extension, article I, section 9, of the Florida Constitution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.