¶1Affirmed. See Reese v. State, 899 So.2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (confirming that infirmity in notice of intent to seek enhanced sentence must be raised in a timely Rule 3.850 motion); Tunsil v. State, 797 So.2d 651, 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(re-manding for resentencing as expressly ordered and stating “[defendant need not be present” for same).
929 So. 2d 665
Tunsil v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 17, 2006
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-05-17
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 2012
9 state decisions
Relies on Tuggerson v. State · 797 So. 2d 651 - Tunsil v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2006-05-17
View the full empirical analysis of this case →